subscribe to our ezine search our site about dolly contact us about us sign up, discuss or post! home page


READ:
Quarantine
Learning Resources
Pet Care
Lost & Found

join our discussion board

TAKE ACTION:
Action Groups
Volunteer In Your Area
New Thinking About Animals
Spay & Neuter
Anti-Vivisection

Homes Needed Listing

FIND GROUPS:
Dogs
Cats
SPCAs
Horses & Donkeys
Farm Animals
Wildlife
Reptiles

LOCATE:
Pet-Friendly Holidays
Other Irish Sites
Vets


THE GRIM FATE OF THE IRISH BADGER


An Broc No: 23 Spring 2001: The Badgerwatch (Ireland) newsletter.

BadgerWatch Ireland Spring 2001 Newsletter (also available in printout form)

(Affiliated to the Irish Wildlife Trust, 107, Lower Baggot St. Dublin 2. Ireland. Associate member of the National Federation of Badger Groups (United Kingdom)

National Co-ordinator: Bernie Barrett, 5,Tyrone Avenue, Lismore Lawn, WATERFORD Ireland. Tel/Fax 051-373876. E-MAIL: barrettb@gofree.indigo.ie

Foot and Mouth Disease could spell disaster for wildlife too:
Sharp shooters from the Irish Army are on standby to cull or quarantine wildlife (including badgers) in the vicinity of any outbreaks of foot-and-mouth disease FMD. Duchas, the National Parks and Wildlife Service will take charge of the emergency containment plan which was drawn up early in March. Wildlife in the vicinity of the infection will be assessed and "appropriate action" taken immediately. We're told that the action, which can take place at the drop of a hat (even faster than it took Duchas to magically change the wire badger snare to a restraining device) will include teams of riflemen from the Army Rangers.

While we fully acknowledge the effects of FMD and its consequences, this is drastic action for wildlife who may be caught up in this potential disaster. Dare anyone voice an objection on their behalf. We've seen it and heard it all before. For far too long badgers have been at the wrong end of the .22 rifle for offences not of their making. They will always be the soft target. Our badgers have been listed in the past as possible reservoirs for cattle TB . In the awful event of FMD surfacing in the Irish Republic, will this disease also be added to the list? At the end of the day will we still have the small army of animal smugglers, the removers of ear tags and the perpetrators of the countless scams which appears to have long infested the agri-industry on this island?

Such a measure of wildlife control has been rejected (so far) in Britain after leading experts in the fields of Agriculture and wildlife management advised that such a measure could merely exacerbate the problem of FMD by the dispersal of wildlife who may be potential carriers into clean areas. This makes sense. Having Army and Duchas personnel, moving from farm to farm, identifying setts, setting snares and returning to shoot the occupants and disposing of carcasses, can certainly be counter-productive. Distressed by this new disturbance, some wildlife (and there will always be the snare-shy ones) will certainly flee, possibly carrying the virus from the infected area to a clean locality.

At the time of printing, Ireland remains free of FMD. It goes without saying presently that all activities of badger-watching and sett monitoring be totally avoided. Badgers and foxes are not susceptible to the disease but, like any other animal and human, may be carriers. The virus may live for up to 14 days on fur, clothing and footwear. Our sympathies are with the farming families who have worked hard and obeyed the rules. We can only pray that all be spared the affliction of having FMD visited upon them.

Update on Irish Government's badger culling strategies:
Unfortunately the plight of badgers failed to make the agenda of the 20th Standing Committee of the Bern Convention held Nov/Dec 2000 in Strasbourg. Complaints for the next session of the Standing Committee will be lodged before September 2001. Badgerwatch is hoping to attend this session.

The Irish Government in compliance with the 1999 Bern Convention request, submitted an annual report through the Department of Agriculture (Report of the Department of Agriculture Food & Rural Development on Meles meles in Ireland.) This report was accompanied by an annexe from the National Parks and Wildlife Service. Submitting such annual 'progress' reports on its research programme into Mycobacterium bovis infection in cattle and badgers, at least puts our Government in a situation of accountability. The report is worth looking up and if you've got access to a computer it can be found on www.nature.coe.int We will deal briefly with some of the issues.

The Report dealt with the following issues:

    Reviewing the question for a closed season for capture and removal of badgers.
    Reviewing the capture methods involved.
    Ensuring that the control of badgers does not result in its disappearance in the areas involved.
Sections of the report are ingenious, not for what is stated but rather what is carefully omitted. The BTB Eradication Programme commenced in Ireland in the 1954 when 17% of the national herd tested positive for TB. The levels have now dropped to 0.4% says the report. It failed to add that the reduced levels were first achieved way back in 1965 when Ireland was declared legally bovine TB free. Strict monitoring of cattle and stringent control of cattle movement was the order of the day.

There were no badger culling strategies in place at that time which appears to demonstrate the fact that badgers either play an extremely minor role in the spread or bovine TB or no role at all. On page three of the report, 'Requirement for a closed season' made interesting reading. Closed seasons are normally a requirement for hunted species whose numbers would otherwise be endangered. While our indigenous badger is not legally hunted, we must accept that the illegal pastimes of badger digging and baiting plus the nocturnal lamping excursions are still operating on a regular basis. In short, it's rather unlikely that the lack of a recognised hunting season has afforded badger numbers any real succour.

It goes on to say that the only areas where badger numbers have been significantly reduced are those comprising the Four-Area project and the area in East Offaly. In total these amount to less than 2% of the land mass. In dealing with badger casualties, we note that the report tends to favour the use of percentages to demonstrate just how benign this badger-killing strategy really is. Percentages can paint a blurred picture. Since the badger was first isolated as a suspect in the bovine TB problem, the DOA has succeeded in exterminating close on 30,000 of them on this island (mostly in the last decade) which must be acknowledged as a significant reduction by any standards!

Still on the same page, "No further large-scale high intensity population reductions are envisaged" says the report "and as such there is no area where the local population is endangered." The report, (Meles meles in Ireland) was submitted to the Bern Committee early in the Autumn of 2000. Six months earlier, the DOA had been in the news regarding a further badger-culling project (cull number 5). As part of the Partnership for Prosperity and Fairness deal (PPF), it had agreed to demands by farm organisations to kill even more badgers. To quote from the relevant part of the document (p 68) " In addition to current arrangements relating to wildlife, take a pro-active approach in each District Veterinary Office area, using 75 dedicated Departmental and Farm Relief Service personnel, to the removal of all sources of infection in the 20% of the country that yields some 50% of current TB reactors; the distribution of these resources will be finalised in consultation with farm organisations".

This cull was due to commence on 1st September 2000. Our badgers enjoyed a temporary respite from the snare because of a delay in finalising agreements on certain issues in the PPF. In a written communication regarding this cull, Duchas stated "The DOA intend to intensify their activity in blackspot areas and intend to employ extra staff to do so. It is not possible to say how many badgers will be taken under these licences but it is likely to be a substantial increase on the previous yearly number of around 3,000". The purpose of this cull is to reduce the incidence of bovine TB by 50% over the next four years. The position is then to be reviewed. Yet, nowhere the DOA's report to the Bern Committee do we see any reference to this latest and important badger-culling project. Surely, the removal of all sources of infection in the 20% of the country...... by the use of the wire snare, must be a breach of Articles 7 and 8 of the Bern Convention?

Annexe to the Department of Agriculture's Report to Bern Committee by National Parks and Wildlife Service. ( Report on the control of badgers in Ireland)

This report refers to the annual progress on the following;

    Progress on the research programme on bovine TB infection in cattle and badgers. Part of this dealt with the use of the Gamma-interferon Test. It is used to compliment the comparative skin test in problem herds. Wider use is planned for next year. Badgerwatch is awaiting details of the level of testing by this method for the years 1999 and 2000. Research for the development of a badger vaccine continues.
    Review the need for a closed season for snaring and removal of badgers.
The DOA research suggests there is no need for a closed season. Badgerwatch contends that the need for a closed season has long gone unrecognised (See article "February brings little joy") It is widely accepted that 50% of badger cubs fail to survive the first year of life. A closed season on snaring during the first four months of the year is needed. It would help the species through this most critical of times, to born and rear their young. However, to be seen to be Bern compliant, Duchas has kindly introduced a closed season in the Four Area Research project for the months of June, July and August. What's the one about lending an umbrella when the sun shines?

Mid-summer is THE most inopportune time for snaring operations. It is known that badger-culling projects tend to get under way in Autumn. The reason being that the dense undergrowth of the summer months has begun to die back, exposing badger setts and thus expediting the whole operation of snare setting. This move to select the less active summer months for a cessation of field activities is an empty gesture which affords little or no benefits to the badger populations. The UK observes a closed season on trapping from January - April 30th. This is what is required in this country.

Review the capture methods:
The DOA, have reviewed capture methods and according to the report have found no evidence to support a hypothesis that other methods provide a better welfare benefit. Indeed! The capture of badgers by use of the indiscriminate wire snare remains a barbaric practice which should have been outlawed long before now. The renaming of this lethal weapon to a 'restraining device' changes nothing. Badgerwatch finds it unacceptable that the present means of capturing badgers be allowed to continue. By pursuing this method of capture, it would appear, Ireland is in breach of Article 8 of the Bern Convention.

Local disappearance of badger populations:
Badgerwatch disputes claims by the DOA that there is no risk of local disappearance of the species. Almost 1,800 badgers were removed during the East Offaly Badger Removal Project over a five year period. To validate its findings, four similar badger culling projects are presently being carried out in Cork, Donegal, Monaghan and Kilkenny. Last year, Minister J.Walsh gave the go-ahead for another major cull as part of the PPF agreement. To quote " the removal of ALL sources of infection in the 20% of the country that yields 50% of the reactors...". Naturally such intensive culling in 'Project' areas will certainly lead to local disappearance of badgers. Duchas seems to have decided at a later date that a condition of the licences would be that badger populations should not be reduced below 20% in such project areas. We asked how this would be achieved. We wondered if a regular 'quota' of snared badgers would be released back to the wild in project areas? The answer appears to be no, but we were assured that a % of badgers are always "missed" in normal snaring operations. In the absence of any other explanation, it seems that the responsibility now lies with the badgers themselves to make such snaring projects Bern compliant!

Badgerwatch believes that snaring was due to get under way early in 2001. On 15/12/00 we forwarded the first of the emails to the DOA for information on the following:


    The number of cattle TB tested by the Gamma- interferon blood test in 1999 and 2000
    To inform Badgerwatch of the date of the PPF badger removal project in 2001. Despite a follow -up with more emailing pleas, faxes and 'phone calls we have not received the relevant information from the DOA. We have been informed however, that due to the present crises of FMD all badger snaring operations have been suspended.

    *The Programme for Prosperity and Fairness. (PPF)
    The PPF are negotiations on a new national Agreement which were formally launched on 9/11/99. They are the latest in a series of agreements between the government and the social partners going back to 1987. Framework II of the document deals with Agriculture which includes the Animal Disease Eradication programme

    February brings little joy to our badger nation:
    Badgerwatch was contacted one morning recently by a kind-hearted man. " I'm afraid I have some bad news for you" said our caller. The story that unfolded was a sad one, but anyone involved with badger/wildlife conservation would be only too familiar with the following details. Gerry was on his way to work. Intrigued by a the sight of a fox in what appeared to be an unnatural set-up near the road, he decided to investigate. Gerry had accidentally stumbled across a badger sett which was surrounded by no less than six snares. One snare contained the fox. An adult badger was caught in another snare. Worse still, the actual sett itself had been dug out and lying at the entrance was the body of a tiny badger cub whose short life had been brought to an abrupt end by the sick element who had destroyed the sett.

    Badgerwatch was able to identify the snares by their markings as being Department of Agriculture property. On a Monday morning we wondered if these snares had been set on a Friday or Sunday evening? How often had they actually checked? There are many questions regarding this incident that need answering. Here we had a badger sett surrounded by half a dozen snares apparently fixed in position by the men from the DOA. This is a legal operation (sadly) and we presume the necessary licences were in place. Who had actually disturbed this sett? What had been the fate of the remaining litter of cubs or other badger inhabitants? Had illegal badger-diggers merely stumbled across this sett accidentally? How convenient.

    It is probable that they worked under the cover of darkness with their powerful lamping equipment. Maybe a sow badger had been out worming and missed the diggers. On returning she may have witnessed the destruction of her home and the killing of her offspring before she was caught in the deadly snare.

    Badgerwatch believes that hundreds of cubs die underground from starvation at this time of the year when nursing sows have been snared by the DOA or the cubs may be killed when they emerge from the sett looking for mother. This badger family was doomed from the start, one way or the other. The men from the 'Department' would be back that very evening and the snares would remain in situ to fulfill their dubious duty. Snaring we're told usually continues in any one location over a period of about ten days. Badgerwatch has often stressed the fact that the Department of Agriculture through its policy of snaring, frequently leaves the snared animal abandoned in a state of extreme risk. A snared animal is indeed a soft target for the scum who get their kicks from abusing wildlife. Its long past time that our so-called protected badgers + their offspring were at least afforded the luxury of a closed season from persecution (of the legal variety, at least) to relieve pressure on the species through their breeding period.

    **************************************

    MPs slam Ministers for indecision NFBG 10 January 2001 News Release

    The National Federation of Badger Groups (NFBG) 10 January 2001 welcomed the Agriculture Committee's new report on bovine TB in cattle. The report is a damning critique of the government's complete lack of direction and indecision in finding a sustainable solution to the problem.

    "We are grateful to the MPs for recognising the fact, that despite its claims to the contrary, the Ministry of Agriculture is really only interested in killing badgers. "Dr. King continued, "This is a grave warning to Ministers and we urge Nick Brown and Baroness Hayman to think more strategically and constructively about this issue."

    "The NFBG, together with many other organisations, has provided a series of coherent recommendations which we believe would be effective in controlling bovine TB in cattle and would be acceptable to both farmers and the public. We now look forward to working with Ministers to see these recommendations implemented as a matter of urgency."

    Key points in Agriculture Select committee report:

    Indecision:
    Committee states that it is the responsibility of Ministers to make the ultimate decisions and that this must not be delayed until, "the crises of no clear results from such an expensive and controversial programme is upon us."

    Lack of direction:
    Committee expresses concern at the government's lack of direction and recommends action be taken to: increase the frequency of cattle tests. Produce cattle test results on sale. Committee expresses disappointment at the lack of progress on a more accurate TB test for cattle.

    Future policy:
    Committee criticises the government for lack of forward planning on possible future policy options, especially as advice from the Independent Scientific Group (ISG), which is overseeing the trial, is disputable and will be disputed. Government should find a Plan B, which is not currently in development.

    Statistics in culling trial:
    Committee recommends that the ISG should estimate the duration and accuracy of the trial. The ISG should also be more positive about constructive criticism.

    Animal welfare:
    Committee recommends continued monitoring and evaluation of animal welfare issues.

    Trial:
    Committee expresses concern that the timetable has slipped considerably. Illegal activity by farmers and landowners is a concern. Support trial as a way of obtaining information on the relationship between bovine TB in cattle and badgers and whether badger culling is a viable option.

    Badger RTA survey (road traffic accident):
    Committee recommends that the resources should be provided so this may be conducted, as directed by the ISG. TB cattle in food chain: Committee recommends the government seeks advice on the appropriateness of TB cattle carcasses entering the food chain.

    Cattle husbandry:
    Committee reiterates its previous concern that the Krebs report paid little attention to husbandry. Acknowledges Husbandry Panel report but recommends that a more detailed study be conducted, to improve information exchange with farmers and to seek practical measures to reduce the spread of bovine TB.

    TB 99 questionnaire:
    This is aimed to identify cattle husbandry practices which increase the risk of infection to cattle. Committee expresses concern that MAFF has cut resources to the questionnaire. Suggests lack of commitment to non-badger elements of TB control programme.

    TB Forum:
    Committee expressed regret at the NFU (National Farmers Union) leaving Forum and recommends that it rejoin to ensure its members are properly represented.

    Vaccine:
    Committee supports vaccine as the most sustainable strategy to control TB in cattle. Accepts it may take 10-15 years to develop.

    Minister considers killing more badgers NFBG News Release, 7/2/01

    The National Federation of Badger Groups (NFBG) today (7 February 2001) condemned Nick Brown, Minister for Agriculture, for considering killing more badgers. Mr. Brown today told the NFU's (National Farmers Union) AGM that he was considering their request to kill badgers beyond the existing Krebs trial cull of up to 20,000 badgers.

    Dr. Elaine King, Conservation Officer for the NFBG, said "Mr. Brown has been told by all of Britain's leading nature conservation and animal welfare groups that such a course of action is unnecessary and unacceptable. It is also opposed by Mr. Brown's advisors in the Independent Scientific Group. "Yet the Minister has been considering the NFU's request for more than six months, despite this coherent opposition. He must cease prevaricating and reject the NFU's shameful proposal." "The longer the Minister considers the proposal, the more farmers will be encouraged to think that culling badgers will solve their problems."

    "Britain's small and family farmers need practical help that's good for wildlife, good for cattle welfare and - most importantly - acceptable to the public. The mass extermination of badgers will only deepen the public's growing distaste for intensive agri-business and its products."

    **************************************

    Press Watch............Press Watch............Press Watch............Press Watch............

    Bishop caught in hunting controversy (Ireland on Sunday.) Dara Defaoite 24/9/00. The Bishop of Clonfert, Rev John Kirby, is to review the use of his land by the Galway Blazers Foxhunt during its annual foxhunting season after wildlife on his Loughrea estate was maliciously interfered with. Bishop Kirby was alerted to a deliberately blocked badger sett, where up to 20 badgers once lived, by Duchas, the wildlife and heritage service, after a complaint was lodged by a local man and former hunter.

    "I wasn't aware that there were any badger setts on my land and, until this controversy arose, I had no way of knowing about it one way or the other," said the bishop. "I am concerned and will have to take a look now at how the land is being used by the hunt and local farming interests," he said. The blocked badger sett, where 11 of the 12 entrances were deliberately closed, was brought to the attention of Duchas by former hunt member and retired farmer, Tom Hardiman.

    Hardiman pointed out that it was tactic within the hunting fraternity to practise "earth-stopping" so that the hunted animal wasn't allowed the opportunity to go to ground. Bishop Kirby stated that he didn't suspect it had anything to do with hunting on the land "but may in fact be farmers who see badgers as a threat to livestock, with the risk of tuberculosis."

    "Predecessors of mine never had a problem with the Blazers, but now a case has been made and I'll just have to look at it," said Dr. Kirby.

    "When I initially gave permission 12 years ago, I specified that there was to be no digging out of any fox once it went to ground and that dens or setts were not to be closed," he said. A spokesman for the Galway Hunt which used to hunt the land for 40 years told Ireland on Sunday, "There was no way we interfered with any badger sett and we are looking forward to meeting the Bishop regarding the issue."

    Hardiman has launched a public campaign against his former hunt, stating that he was "so appalled by the cruelty meted out to the fox over the years, that he had to speak out."

    He told Ireland on Sunday that he was infuriated after the Department of Agriculture referred a complaint he made against the Galway Blazers to the Hunting Association of Ireland (HAI) for investigation. "This association is an umbrella group for the hunting fraternity, so the Government has effectively allowed these people to investigate themselves," said Hardiman.

    The HAI replied to Hardiman's complaint last month, stating: Allegations in your letter could not be substantiated and it has Been recommended that no action be taken against the Galway Blazers Hunt." Bishop Kirby commented: "It appears somebody has closed a number of the badger setts on the land and I will now be looking into the matter further. The land is let to a tillage farmer. I'm not a rural person and I don't know whether they are opened yet, but I will be leaving it in the hands of Duchas and the authorities," he said.

    ***************************************

    20% of TB scourge is caused by 'bought-ins' Ann Fitzgerald Farming Independent 12/10/01

    Bought-in cattle are potentially causing over 20% of all TB breakdowns, the Department of Agriculture is claiming in support of its push for the reintroduction of a pre-movement TB test. The figures were presented at last week's Animal Health Forum meeting which focused on the new TB and Brucellosis regimes. The farming bodies report some progress from the meeting but say the two sides are poles apart. A further meeting, chaired by Dept. Of Agriculture secretary John Malone, is due to take place today.

    Many of the key issues under discussion are still unresolved. These include the pre-movement test, the proposed increase in disease eradication levies, the valuation ceiling (which has now been increased to (£1,800), the income supplement and the conditions relating to full market value. In its examination of the role of bought-in cattle on disease restrictions, the Department looked at the period from March 1 - May 31, 2000, during which the total number of breakdowns was 2,261.

    Half of all breakdowns - 1,129 - were due to singleton reactors, of which 188 (16.7%) were clearly identified as caused by bought-in cattle. This "clear indication" refers to where the original herd was found to have TB afterwards. In addition, in a further 65 cases (5.8%), bought-in cattle were a potential source.

    Thus, bought-in Cattle potentially caused over 22% of all singleton breakdowns. Of the 1,132 multiple breakdowns, 150 (13.3%) were clearly identified as being caused by bought-in cattle while a further 84 cases (7.4%), bought-in cattle were deemed to be a potential source. Thus the bought-in cattle caused over 20% of all multiple breakdowns. Overall, the figures blame bought-in cattle for possibly 21.5% of all breakdowns - almost 15% were firmly identified and the other 6.5% as a potential cause.

    *************************************

    Farmers Convicted over TB deceit Irish Times 1/12/00

    Two Co. Cork farmers received suspended prison sentences and were fined yesterday when they appeared at Macroom District Court charged with injecting slurry into cattle, so as to alter the accuracy of TB testing. William O'Brien (50) of Lehanagh, Carrigadrohid Cork, was charged with five offences including possession of a syringe, possession of a container of liquid slurry, administering an unauthorised animal remedy and carrying out a process affecting the accuracy of TB testing.

    Michael Kelleher (38) of Upper Mount Massey, Macroom, was charged with two accounts of affecting TB testing in three cattle. A Dept. Of Agric. veterinary inspector, Mr. Brian Flaherty, told Judge James O'Connor that as a result of information received he and colleagues went to O'Brien's farm on February 8th 1999.

    They saw O'Brien injecting three cattle in the neck. The cattle were held by Kelleher in a cattle crush. They seized a syringe as well as a container of liquid slurry and when the men were confronted they admitted what had been going on. The purpose of their action, Mr Flaherty said, was to gain compensation under the TB eradication scheme.

    Under this scheme O'Brien was due to collect £29,000 through grants, but these monies were now forfeited. Both men pleaded guilty. Judge O'Connor said he had no doubt they deserved substantial prison sentences. What they had done was despicable and had caused great inconvenience to the State, the taxpayer and neighbouring farmers whose cattle had to be restricted.

    There was also the very serious health threat to consumers if the affected meat had got into the food chain as well as the pain and suffering caused to the animals. Judge O'Connor sentenced O'Brien to four months' imprisonment on the charge of carrying out a process that could affect TB testing, but suspended the sentence on condition that he pay £1,000 to the court's poor box and £250 to the Irish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals.

    On a second similar charge he fined the defendant £750 and £750 towards the State's costs. A fine of £500 was imposed on the charge of possessing a container with liquid slurry, £350 relating to the possession of a syringe and £250 relating to the charge of administering the substance to an animal in order to affect TB testing. On the first of three similar charges concerning tampering with the accuracy of a TB test, Kelleher was sentenced to two month's imprisonment, suspended on the condition that he pay £600 to the poor box and £250 to the ISPCA. On the second charge he was fined £400 and ordered to pay £250 towards the State's costs. A fine of £250 was imposed for the third charge.

    ***************************************

    Some Conservation/Wildlife WEBSITE:s of interest:

    Foxwatch Ireland www.homepage.eircom.net/~foxwatchireland

    Irish Wildlife Trust www.iwt.ie

    National Federation of Badger Groups (UK) www.nfbg.org.uk

    Irish Council Against Blood Sports www.banbloodsports.com

    Council of Europe (Bern Protected Species) www.coe.int

    Earthwatch www.iol.ie/~foeeire

    Birdwatch Ireland www.birdwatchireland.ie

    Wild Ireland www.wildireland.ie

    Irish Peatland Conservation www.ippc.ie

    Duchas The Heritage Service www.heritageireland.ie

    Subscription
    Name....................................................
    Postal Address...................................
    Order/Cheque/Bank Draft (tick) ....................................................
    Individual membership....... £5.
    .......................................................
    Family......... £15


    Tel. No. ................................................
    Donation............(Optional)
    E-MAIL::..................................................
    Please include SAE for receipt if required.
    Send to:
    Badgerwatch (Ireland)
    5, Tyrone Ave., Lismore Lawn
    WATERFORD Ireland.
    Expect next copy of An Broc in September 2001
    **************************

    Badgerwatch (Ireland) c/o
    5, Tyrone Ave.,
    Lismore Lawn,
    Waterford city
    Tel/fax 051373876
    barrettb@gofree.indigo.ie


Our Millie Takes You Home